Saturday, November 18, 2006

The Hidden Disasters

The Return of Peter Parker's Parents. This thing started up right when I was probably heaviest into comics (prior to now, as I've somewhat widened my horizons). It seemed like kind of a cool idea at the time: Peter's parents - thought dead in a plane crash twenty years ago - return, having apparently been in a Soviet prisoner of war camp, what with being secret agents and all. Peter's happy his parents are back, but kind of out of sorts, since they've been gone so long it's hard to relate to them. Aunt May's his parental figure now, after all. Still, he's trying to get to know them, and they're trying to know him, though his dad had kind of an anger problem.

Ultimately, Peter tells them he's Spider-Man, and based on a spider-sense tingle he gets the next time he sees them, decides Aunt May wasn't senile for insisting they weren't who they said they were. Of course, they turn out to be artificial life forms, created by the Chameleon to determine Spider-Man's identity, based on the theory Parker must know who Spidey is, what with all the photos he takes. Spidey shows up, big fight, the Mom-bot has developed real feelings for Peter and saves him from crazy Dad-bot, only to have her life drained by Vulture (via weird rejuvenator technology doohickey he stole a few issues earlier), who winds up being young as a result (until he's not anymore). Peter goes on a manhunt for the Chameleon, finds him, basically terrifies him into a coma, and finds out the now dead Harry Osborn was behind it all. Yikes.

Whew, give me a moment, that was a lot of suck. OK, maybe not. It started off kind of interesting, and I suppose it follows the Spidey adage that everything good must be offset by some bad and vice versa. But this was too much bad. This is the story that made Spider-Man dark, which is always a good idea. I mean, who doesn't enjoy reading comics where Peter Parker thinks of himself as "The Spider" (no mysticism required though, there is that), and tends to flip out during battles, pounding his enemies into mulch, and usually screaming about not letting anyone else he loves get hurt? Ugh.

But when people talk about the stories that almost wrecked Spidey, this one always seems to pass by without mention. Maybe because the Clone Saga kicked off about a year later, or because Maximum Carnage took place right in the middle of it, or because Harry Osborn died shortly before and took the spotlight. I don't know.

What are some other disastrous story arcs that seem to not receive the ridicule they deserve?

7 comments:

SallyP said...

CIVIL WAR! It needs even more ridicule. Lots more.

CalvinPitt said...

sallyp: But I'm not sure the Internet can handle much more! It may shut down from all the snark!

...

But yeah, it really is kind of sad to see the whole thing unfold.

Anonymous said...

And House of M is the new return of Spidey's Parents.

I haven't forgotten a possibly facinating idea of a "What If Magneto Ruled the World?" turned into two issues of "Wowee, lookit all this, it's wrong and ALL QUICKSILVER'S FAULT!" filled out in the middle by splash pages and self-congradulatory "Look it's AoA again, no really!"

And Avengers: Disassembled? The story arc that killed Marvel's JLA?

Oh no, Civil War is taking all the flak for mistakes that started about a year ago.

And despite me being stuck on the past year or so of Marvel Comics, this is an awesome question.

Marc Burkhardt said...

Atlantis Attacks, which was stupid enough to make me swear off Marvel for a year or two.

But, for whatever reason, I wasn't smart enough to avoid the What If that pondered what would have happened if the heroes had lost!

I can never rip the image of Sue Richards, She Hulk, etc. getting eaten by snakes ...

Oh yeah, and there was that stupid Godwave thing Byrne did for DC that wrecked the New Gods for the thousandth time.

And now that I'm really on a roll, how about Spider-Man: Chapter One and that whole Gwen Stacy/Norman Osborne thing?

Anonymous said...

The MadGoblin over at Spideykicksbutt.com also noted how the return of the parents storyline kicked off Clone Saga rage.

I always thought it was one of the most inane things ever to happen in the Spider-books. So, Peter's parents are back. So what? There's not much you can do with that in a superhero comic, past the question of "they are real or they're not." And since Peter's not a teenager anymore, but a married adult with his own life, there's not much potential for drama. What I found most insulting about it, however, was that this idea was chosen for the 30th Anniversary. WHY??? Here's an idea for a 45th Anniversary- get Roger Stern, Kurt Busiek, Peter David, Ann Nocenti, Stan Lee, Steve Ditko, Marv Wolfman JRSR, JRJR and other great Spider-creators and just have them tell some cool stories.

CalvinPitt said...

fortress: I think I have that What If. Yeah, that was pretty lame. And I would hope the Gwen/Norman thing isn't flying under the radar, but it probably got obscured by The Other.

dan: Yeah, the potential was kind of limited wasn't it? And I'd forgotten it was the 30th anniversary. I liked Spectactcular's Peter/Harry Osborn confrontation better myself.

Anonymous said...

Calvin: YES. One of J.M. DeMatteis' best stories, and one of the reasons he's One of the Best Spider-Writers Ever.