
I like Kyle Hotz' depiction of Wraith, because the mouth is almost always a thin line, and the eyes are usually narrow slits, contrasted with most of the other characters' much wider eyes, and mouths that are open more frequently. It gives a sense of how closed off Wraith is, that they are no entrances inside him. Furthermore, it works nicely with the lettering of Wraith's caption boxes. The font seems really small, so that you feel as though you're reading them at a great distance, which adds to the sense of disconnect between us and the title character.
Anyway, I guess it's a good thing the Phalanx have layers to their plans, I like the idea of a "fear control subroutine", and I like that some of the Kree are coming down with Stockholm Syndrome, or whatever the Kree equivalent is. 3.0 out of 5.

Reilly Brown art notes: He draws a very nice "Storm with one eyebrow raised". Very imperious looking. Also, last issue Wade got impaled in the chest, and shot through in the head. Even though those injuries are healed this issue, the concurrent damage to his costume remains. I just think it's a nice touch. However, his Ben Grimm's don't look noticeably different, so I can't figure why the Ben of the past made the comment about the present Ben's face. Maybe Wade was right; Ben really does need to look in the mirror.
Also, Joe Sinnott name check, Part 1! Wade mentions him as part of a way of gauging how far into the past he is. I include this for reasons that will become clear later. It was an enjoyable issue, but I still wish Wade had gotten to do more, besides get knocked silly by the Thing, and make comments about Sixties era Sue Storm's chest. 4.0 out of 5. I guess I wasn't that bothered by Wade being a bystander, after all.
Immortal Iron Fist #10 - Oh, that's right. It got pushed back to November. Silly me. I'm sure it's all because of Quesada being behind on his One More Day artwork. Or because Frank Cho is behind on Mighty Avengers. One of the two. Moving along.

Maybe it was all an exercise in exposition, in which I case I guess I should commend Bendis for an attempt to bring people up to speed. Eh, I'll commend later. Once again, though, I want to say I like Kitty's new costume. And I like that even though there's no sign of eye holes, or anything that would allow her to see where she's going, there's a panel where she fires a weapon, and the flash from it outlines her sockets underneath the mask. Nice touch. What isn't a nice touch is that on pages 13 and 14, where the panels go back and forth across the two pages, they don't line up. Not in the sense that they've been set on the page in an incorrect order or anything, just that the panels are slightly off, so that on one page you have Peter's hand, and on the other page, his wrist, but they don't connect properly. It looks slipshod.
Joe Sinnott name check #2! This time around, poor Joe Sinnott is Norman Osborn's attorney, and he may have stolen Norman's money while Osborn was a guest of Nick Fury. And Wikipedia tells me this Joe Sinnott name-checking must be in honor of his birthday, which was last week, so happy birthday! Sorry Bendis has you killed. Clearly, Bendis hates inkers who worked on Fantastic Four for fifteen years. Shame, Bendis, shame.
Finally, there a physics aspect that seems to be off on the final page. Even though Peter falls out of a window first, then Norman a few panels later, Osborn appears to have passed him on the way down, or at least caught up. It doesn't work like that, Mr. Immonen, come on, now. 3.4 out of 5.
3 comments:
Wasn't it Galileo who dropped Marvel characters of different masses off of a tower to prove that an object's time of descent doesn't correspond to their mass?
Guess Bendis and Immonen missed that class at Marvel U.
I do believe that a pound of feathers and a pound of steel fall at the same rate. And it sounds as though your professor would have been right at home with the Calculator and Oracle in last weeks Birds of Prey.
Ultimate Spider-man was ok, but yes, Carol was being an idiot. I thought that she was really getting way too much enjoyment out of jerking Peter around.
Wait...that didn't come out the way that I planned.
fortress keeper: According to Wikipedia, it was actually Giambattista Benedetti, but Galileo's biographer (probably Millar) shifted the credit.
sallyp: I might be able to see my professor hanging with Calculator and oracle, but then he'd started stuffing a flying squirrel and all bets would be off.
Post a Comment