War to the Death is concerned primarily with the sieges of the Spanish city of Saragossa during the Napoleonic Wars. Rudorff starts with the state of Spain in the early 1800s, which is to say, a former world power that was now not even second-rate. Declining populations in the cities, along with dozens of villages simply abandoned or deserted (though he doesn't get into the why of decline. Immigration? Disease?) Largely culturally stagnant, with a strong religious presence that, at the higher levels of power, pushed back against science and the ideas of the Enlightenment as dangerous. Ruled by an ineffectual dullard of a king, whose wife was sleeping with his chief advisor.
Actually, in addition to repeatedly commenting how physically ugly Charles IV and his wife, Queen Maria Luisa, were, Rudorff keeps coming back to how Charles has no clue the guy he trusts so implicitly, Manuel Godoy, is schtupping his wife. Rudorff almost seems to take it personally, like it's an insult to the grand tradition of European royalty that these people rule a country. The book was published in 1974, and there's a petty part of me hoping subsequent scholarship revealed Charles knew all about the affair and was completely fine with it. Maybe that was even his thing.
Anyway, once Napoleon, who seemed to regard Spain largely as some place that needed securing so he could to get to Portugal, had the royal family ousted to put his brother in charge (over Joseph's objections, since he wanted to stay in Naples), the people of Spain, the working classes, got a little fired up. They didn't love their king by any stretch, and maybe they didn't understand how largely useless his son, Ferdinand VII, was, but he was at least Spanish. "They're idiots, but they're our idiots," that kind of thing. The French are invaders, usurpers, trampling upon the sovereignty of their land.
Saragossa is not the only city that supported Ferdinand as true ruler of Spain and refused to acknowledge Joseph Bonaparte. They might have been the most successful at resisting Napoleon's armies, even if they ultimately were forced to capitulate. They didn't lose easily. Rudorff discusses the civilian and military authorities that form, not just in Saragossa but elsewhere. How they try to decide on a course of action, or who gets to make which decisions. He gets into the rise of Jose Palafox, the closest thing to a supreme commander Saragossa had, even if he did flee the city early in the first siege. Which was kind of funny, Rudorff spent all these pages building Palafox up as an inspirational figure, and then he bails, only to return when the city proves more resistant than expected.
The thing about Saragossa, and to an extent the Spanish campaign in general, is how much it presages a type of warfare that would become more common in the next century. The siege is not a battle on open ground between two armies; it's a force of organized, highly trained soldiers against an entire city. Everyone in Saragossa is resisting. Children are delivering food and ammunition to gunnery crews. Women and monks make wadding for muskets and help erect barricades, when they aren't fighting the French army themselves.
When the French can actually get inside the city walls, they suffer, for the era, serious losses just trying to take one street. The Spanish turn every single house into a fortress the French either have to take or destroy if they want to advance. To take it, they have to clear every floor, because the defenders will retreat to an upper level and fire through holes they made in the floor. Or they'll cross the rooftops to get behind French lines and launch surprise attacks. If the French destroy the building, they still have to take the next one, with no cover from the attacks coming from every window on the street.
All those stories you read or hear about Stalingrad, the fighting from street to street, building to building? Dead stacked up everywhere because there's no time to dispose of bodies? Saragossa might just be the OG when it comes to that warfare. Based on the excerpts from memoirs and diaries of French soldiers Rudorff quotes - he notes that, at least when this was written, there didn't seem to be much scholarship or excerpts on the siege from Spain's perspective, even in the city itself - this kind of fighting wasn't something any of them were accustomed to.
This is something new, and no one is entirely ready for it or the toll it takes. The French aren't fighting a distinct army, but an entire country. No one will help them, their attempts to requisition or demand food or water are ignored. Their messengers are captured once they're out of sight of the main force. Rudorff mentions at one point soldiers couldn't risk getting 100 yards from their unit, or they'd likely be ambushed and killed. And it would likely be a brutal ugly death. Which in turn, made the French vengeful whenever they got the chance.
That said, I think Rudorff overplays the novelty of the fury French soldiers exert on Spanish towns when they take them. The pillaging, burning and raping. I don't think that was as unique an experience, historically, as he makes it seem. Also, it's odd to see him describe the as French officers horrified at the soldiers' actions, then three paragraphs later discuss the officers extorting churches or families for gold and jewels. Yeah, they were horrified. . .horrified they didn't get first dibs on some of that booty!
Rudorff covers each siege, one in the summer of 1808, the other the winter of 1808-1809, separately. He does his best to describe Saragossa's layout. Different bridges, gates, monasteries - there are a lot of monasteries - the relative position of the Ebro and Huerva Rivers and their importance for transport or restricting movement. As far as the siege, he tends to discuss in chronological order, focusing on a few days' of fighting in one area, typically until progress in either direction stalls, then switch to a different area. I didn't feel like flipping back to look at the handful of maps of the city he provided, so I couldn't necessarily tell you where the Trinitarian monastery was, relative to Calle Pabostre. That said, the writing makes clear which direction things are trending, as well as how rough the fighting is, which are the more important parts.
Rudorff also describes the quantities of men and material on both sides, the efforts the Spanish went to maintaining gunpowder supplies. Some of the notable figures on both sides, local commanders or civilians who showed great bravery at some critical moment. One thing that becomes crucial in the fighting I hadn't considered was tunneling. Trenches I expected, but especially as the French start simply destroying buildings, or even entire rows of buildings, tunneling underneath them to set mines or gunpowder is a major factor.
He doesn't necessarily go into detail about the experience, maybe because many of the people who took part didn't survive, but there's enough to grasp the dangers of digging and not knowing if you'll burst into someone else's tunnel and have to fight, pickax to shovel. Or finding an opposing tunnel group heard you coming and rigged an explosive in your path.
Early in the second siege, as the French are still getting things in place, Rudorff criticizes Palafox for not staging a massive attack of the city's forces against the French lines. Palafox did try a few attacks, but never more than 300 men in any particular group. Rudorff is sure, if Palafox had sent out thousands, be they soldiers or civilians, the Spanish could have overrun the French.
I don't know that I agree. For one, he mentions a page or two earlier how, with all the people who flooded into the city to help with its defense, soldiers were sleeping on the streets, in the winter, for lack of available space indoors. As a result, combined with the crowding, disease was running rampant. Maybe that's all the more reason to see if they can break the French forces. Set them running, get some breathing space. But a frontal assault seems like the sort of thing you want healthy people for.
More critically, Rudorff spends a fair amount of pages detailing how almost every time Spanish forces met French on open ground, the Spanish got their asses routed. Including a few times with Palafox or his brother in command. While I don't doubt Rudorff is right there would have been no shortage of civilian volunteers, I'm pretty sure it's a different thing to charge across open ground, with little likelihood you can withdraw to safety if things go bad, versus fighting when some invader busts his way through your living room wall. Again, militias of peasants had tried to defend villages against the French on open ground. A lot of those peasants ended up on the tip of a lancer's spear.
The city does fall, eventually, though I have to question if Napoleon wouldn't have been better off just leaving it be. Strategically, I'm not sure it netted him anything close to what it cost. I don't know how War to the Death is regarded among people more knowledgeable about Saragossa, but I found it very informative, and not too technical or difficult to follow.
'In the Plaza, the squadron lost direction. Horsemen galloped wildly around the great square while the inhabitants poured out of their houses and rushed at them with knives, sticks and hatchets. Rider after rider was pulled down by screaming women and youths, hacked, stabbed and bludgeoned to death as their fellow-soldiers had been in Madrid's Puerto del Sol six weeks previously.'









